Narration and voiceovers
Screen clips from videos, ads, and social posts when the voice sounds unusually polished, flat, or disconnected from the rest of the media.
Audio file screening
Check the speech inside an audio file before you publish it, quote it, or treat it as a real human recording.
An AI audio detector is useful when the file is not just a voice note, but a piece of media: a video voiceover, ad read, podcast excerpt, training clip, or short recording from a platform. The tool focuses on speech, so the best input is a clean section where the suspicious voice is easy to hear.
If the file contains music, crowd noise, several speakers, or long silent sections, trim it mentally before you test. Use the part that actually carries the claim or identity you care about. A detector score is more meaningful when it is tied to one specific speaker and one specific moment in the audio.
Screen clips from videos, ads, and social posts when the voice sounds unusually polished, flat, or disconnected from the rest of the media.
Use 10-30 seconds of clear speech. Long files often contain several audio conditions, which can make one overall score less helpful.
Use the result as a review signal before trusting, quoting, reposting, or using an audio clip in a report or product workflow.
Use a section with one speaker, normal volume, and as little processing as possible. Phone calls, screen recordings, and social media downloads can all add compression artifacts, so an unclear result does not automatically mean the voice is fake. If the first result is unclear, test another clean section from the same file and compare the direction of the scores.
This AI audio detector is not a music detector, speaker identification tool, copyright checker, or proof that a file is authentic. It is focused on speech signals in a short selected window. If the file includes a generated music bed with a human voice on top, only the voice portion is relevant to the result. If the file includes several people, cut the question down to one speaker before you rely on the score.
For review teams, the safest pattern is to write down the exact clip section you tested, keep the original file, and note why the audio mattered. That makes the result easier to explain later: you are not saying the whole file is fake, only that one speech sample did or did not show AI-like voice signals.
This page is built for people reviewing a media file that contains speech: a podcast clip, short video, ad voiceover, training sample, product demo, or social post narration. Instead of treating the whole file as one question, pick the section where the voice matters. The browser prepares a short analysis window, the detector reviews the selected speech, and the result gives you a probability-style signal about whether that voice sounds AI-generated or human.
That workflow is different from checking a single private voice message. Media files often contain intro music, edits, transitions, background effects, and platform compression. A clean speech segment is more meaningful than a full upload with mixed conditions. If the file has more than one speaker, test the suspicious speaker separately and write down which section was checked.
Use the result as a review step before publishing, quoting, approving, or archiving the audio. If the file is high-stakes, keep the original source link, note the upload platform, and compare the detector result with context such as creator history, transcripts, metadata, and whether the same audio appears on verified channels.
The detector analyzes the spoken voice in the selected clip. It looks for signals associated with synthetic speech, such as overly smooth delivery, unusual timing, inconsistent voice texture, or artifacts that can appear after generation and compression. It does not analyze the truth of the spoken claim, the identity of the speaker, the visual track in a video, or whether the background music was generated.
The strongest samples contain one speaker, natural speech, stable volume, and enough words to capture rhythm. A narration clip with a clear voiceover usually works better than a noisy livestream, a song, a crowd recording, or a file where the voice is buried under effects. If you are reviewing a video, the relevant part is still the voice, not the camera quality or caption text.
AI audio detection cannot prove that an entire media file is fake. A video can contain real footage with synthetic narration, generated visuals with a human narrator, edited speech from a real interview, or a mixture of human and AI segments. The detector only comments on the selected speech window.
Long files can also create misleading confidence. A podcast may include clean studio audio, phone-call inserts, ads, and music beds in one upload. A single overall score would hide those differences. For serious review, test the relevant segment and compare several clean sections instead of repeating the same noisy part until the answer changes.
Low-risk results should not be treated as proof of authenticity. High-risk results should not be treated as proof of deception. Use the output to decide whether the audio deserves source verification, manual review, or a request for an original file.
The upload flow accepts common audio and short video containers, including MP3, WAV, M4A, OGG, MP4, and WEBM. Speech-only files are easiest to interpret, but short videos can be useful when the voiceover is clear. For best results, use 10 to 30 seconds of one speaker, avoid heavy background music, and avoid clips that have been re-recorded through another device.
A brand receives a polished audio ad from a contractor. Check the narration section before approval, then confirm licensing and production notes separately.
A short clip claims a host said something controversial. Test the clean speech, then look for the original episode, timestamp, and transcript.
A viral video uses a confident voice to explain an event. Check whether the narration sounds synthetic, then verify the source and supporting evidence.
No. This page is focused on spoken voice in audio or video files. It does not classify generated music, beats, instruments, or singing.
Usually no. Use the clearest speech section connected to the claim or voice you need to review. A focused sample is more useful than a long mixed file.
Use 10 to 30 seconds of one clear speaker, normal volume, little background noise, and minimal editing or platform compression.
No. The result is about AI-like speech signals. It does not identify the generator, editing software, model, or person who produced the file.
Compression, noise removal, bad microphones, screen recording, translation dubbing, and speakerphone playback can make real speech sound less natural.