Pause
Do not pay, share a code, or change access while identity is uncertain.
Clone verification
A cloned voice is an identity problem as well as an audio problem. Screen the speech, then confirm the person and request through a channel the caller cannot control.
Open the clone detector
To check a suspected cloned voice, save the original message, isolate the imitated speaker, run a clone signal check, and contact the real person through a previously trusted number or account before acting.
A voice clone detector screens one recording for synthetic speech signals. It does not compare two voices, identify a person, or prove who made the file. Someone can use a real recording out of context, splice human speech, or play audio from another source without generating a clone. Treat the technical result and the identity question as separate parts of the review.
Start with the behavior around the clip. A familiar voice using an unfamiliar number, requesting secrecy, changing payment details, or avoiding a live conversation is suspicious even if the recording sounds natural. The safest response is to pause the requested action while you verify the person.
Use the passage where the suspected person speaks alone. Avoid the caller's introduction, background music, another speaker, or a replay through a loudspeaker. If the message repeats the same phrase, keep the original file rather than recording it again. Re-recording adds room echo and device processing that can confuse both human listeners and automated checks.
For a live call, do not keep the suspected caller engaged just to collect more audio if doing so creates risk. End the call, preserve the number and time, and use a trusted callback route. A short voicemail or message can be tested later without complying with the request.
Call the person on a number already saved in your contacts, open an existing verified account, or contact a mutual trusted person. Do not use a callback number supplied in the suspicious message. For workplaces, follow the normal approval path for payments, credentials, HR changes, and urgent executive requests.
A private question can help, but avoid relying on information that may be public, leaked, or visible on social media. A live interaction tied to a current situation is stronger than a static secret. Organizations should use agreed verification procedures rather than inventing a new challenge during an incident.
Record the source, tested timestamp, detector direction, and independent verification outcome. If the score is unclear, say so. If the score is likely AI, describe it as a screening signal that justified escalation. Do not publish a person's name with a fraud allegation based only on a detector result.
Report confirmed impersonation through the relevant platform, bank, employer, or law-enforcement channel when appropriate. Keep the original file and conversation intact. Screenshots and exported copies are useful, but they should supplement rather than replace the original evidence.
Do not pay, share a code, or change access while identity is uncertain.
Keep the original audio, sender details, time, and requested action.
Test one clean segment for AI or cloned voice signals.
Contact the real person through a trusted route you already had.
No. It screens for synthetic speech signals and does not perform speaker identification or voice matching.
Personal details may be public, stolen, or gathered from social media. Verify through a trusted channel and do not treat knowledge alone as identity proof.
It is usually safer to end the interaction and contact the person or organization through a known route, especially when money or account access is involved.
No. The clip may be a replay, edit, or real person acting fraudulently. Identity verification remains necessary.